The discussion over my article, In Defense of Substantive Due Process, is continuing at Cato Unbound. Prof. Gary Lawson has posted his response here, and now the general discussion is beginning. I responded to David Bernstein’s questions this morning, and I’ll have some further thoughts soon. Please join the discussion!

Update: Is my position true to the original intentions of the framers of the Constitution? The question was raised by Professors Ryan Williams and Michael Rappaport, and I answer it here.

Related posts:

1. The public school teacher debate continues
2. Sackett discussion continues
3. Is Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act constitutional? **Updated**
4. What is “due process of law”?
5. The debate over Substantive Due Process continues